Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Blog Article

III)     Inside the Edition in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed into the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it suitable towards the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified from the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

maintaining the conviction awarded into the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

The reported recovery may be used, within the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot become a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of event. The mentioned memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as practically nothing was discovered due to such pointation. The place of occurrence along with the place of throwing the dead body were already in the knowledge of witnesses prior to their pointation with the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:

In this web site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.

only around the ground of miscases remanded & only about the ground of misreading of evidence only on the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

6.  Mere involvement inside of a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then he is guiding the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more required for further investigation, therefore, his ongoing incarceration would not serve any useful purpose at this stage.

after release from the jail he missing interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is website dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )

VI)     The petitioner is driving the bars because arrest, investigation of the case is complete, he isn't any more expected for your purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him behind the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no useful purpose.

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, may be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It consists of the execution of your convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.

This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to provide an extensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.

Section 489-File from the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective would be to curb counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity in the national currency.

Although the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for your possibility of reconsideration or commutation of the sentence in certain circumstances.